Cash in Transit Compliance Excellence
Manage SIA licensing, route security, and operational compliance with digital tools designed for secure transport operations.
The Challenge
Cash in transit operations face unique compliance challenges combining SIA regulatory requirements, bank client security standards, and operational safety procedures. Every crew member must hold a valid SIA Cash and Valuables in Transit licence, vehicles require specific security equipment and maintenance documentation, and route completion must be verified against strict timing protocols. When security incidents occur or client audits are conducted, your documented procedures and crew training records determine liability and contractual standing.
How Assistant Manager Solves Cash in Transit Compliance
Each module is designed to address the specific challenges cash in transit businesses face every day.
Checklist Management
CIT operations require rigorous pre-route checks and strict collection/delivery procedures - any deviation from protocol creates security and liability exposure
The Problems
Why This Matters for Cash in Transit
- Vehicle security equipment checks are rushed before routes begin, with documentation completed retrospectively rather than as checks occur
Security equipment faults are not identified before routes commence, compromising crew safety and cargo security
- Collection and delivery procedures vary between crews, with some following strict protocols while others take shortcuts during busy periods
Inconsistent procedures create security vulnerabilities and make it difficult to identify where failures occurred during discrepancy investigations
The Solution
How Checklist Management Helps
Mandatory vehicle security checklists with timestamp verification, standardised collection and delivery procedures, and GPS-verified route completion
Every security check is verified as complete, procedures are consistent across all crews, and route completion is documented with location and time evidence
Use Cases:
- • Vehicle security equipment pre-route checks
- • Crew safety equipment verification
- • Customer collection procedure adherence
- • ATM service visit documentation
- • Cash cassette handover verification
- • Smart safe service checklists
- • End of route reconciliation procedures
Feature Screenshot
Checklist Management
Real-World Examples
Example 1: Vehicle security equipment checks are rushed before routes begin, with documentation completed retrospectively rather than as checks occur
Real Scenario
"A CIT vehicle is involved in an attempted attack. The dye pack system fails to activate. Post-incident review reveals the pre-route check was signed off as complete but the actual verification was never performed."
Example 2: Collection and delivery procedures vary between crews, with some following strict protocols while others take shortcuts during busy periods
Real Scenario
"A discrepancy arises at a customer location. Your procedure requires dual verification of cash cassettes, but the crew admits they 'sometimes' skip this when running behind schedule. Without consistent procedure adherence, you cannot determine where the loss occurred."
Scheduling
CIT scheduling must balance operational efficiency with security requirements - predictable patterns are a known vulnerability that scheduling must actively address
The Problems
Why This Matters for Cash in Transit
- Crew assignment does not verify SIA CVIT licence status, leading to risk of deploying unlicensed operatives on cash routes
Unlicensed crews create criminal liability and insurance voidance - if discovered during a robbery, the company faces prosecution alongside the security failure
- Route scheduling does not account for traffic conditions, leading to predictable timing patterns that could be exploited by criminals
Regular timing patterns make routes vulnerable to surveillance and planned attacks
The Solution
How Scheduling Helps
Crew scheduling with SIA CVIT licence validation, route randomisation capabilities, timing variation requirements, and coverage optimisation
Only licensed crews are assigned to routes, timing is varied to prevent pattern establishment, and route coverage is optimised for efficiency and security
Use Cases:
- • SIA CVIT licence verification for crew assignment
- • Route timing randomisation
- • Customer visit window scheduling
- • Crew pairing and rotation
- • Vehicle allocation and capacity planning
- • Relief crew management
- • Bank holiday and seasonal scheduling
Feature Screenshot
Scheduling
Real-World Examples
Example 1: Crew assignment does not verify SIA CVIT licence status, leading to risk of deploying unlicensed operatives on cash routes
Real Scenario
"An operative's CVIT licence expires mid-week. They continue working routes until the monthly licence check. An SIA spot check at a customer location discovers the expired licence, triggering enforcement action."
Example 2: Route scheduling does not account for traffic conditions, leading to predictable timing patterns that could be exploited by criminals
Real Scenario
"Analysis after an attack reveals your vehicle arrived at the target location within a 15-minute window on the same day for months. Criminals had ample time to plan the attack knowing your schedule was predictable."
Time & Attendance
CIT time tracking must provide verifiable evidence for incident investigation while ensuring crews are not working excessive hours that increase security and safety risks
The Problems
Why This Matters for Cash in Transit
- Route start and completion times are self-reported, with no independent verification of when crews were actually on duty
Time records cannot be relied upon for incident investigation, discrepancy analysis, or payroll accuracy
- CIT operatives work early morning starts and late finishes, with Working Time Regulations compliance difficult to monitor
Fatigued crews make errors in collection procedures or are more vulnerable during route completion
The Solution
How Time & Attendance Helps
GPS-verified route start and completion, break monitoring during routes, Working Time Regulations tracking, and accurate payroll time capture
All route times are independently verified, break compliance is monitored, and working hours are tracked for fatigue management
Use Cases:
- • Route start and end time verification
- • Customer location arrival logging
- • Break compliance during routes
- • Working Time Regulations monitoring
- • Overtime tracking and approval
- • Early start pattern monitoring
- • Payroll time integration
Feature Screenshot
Time & Attendance
Real-World Examples
Example 1: Route start and completion times are self-reported, with no independent verification of when crews were actually on duty
Real Scenario
"A discrepancy investigation needs to establish exactly when a vehicle was at a specific location. Crew timesheets are unreliable and GPS tracking was not being used. The investigation cannot establish the facts."
Example 2: CIT operatives work early morning starts and late finishes, with Working Time Regulations compliance difficult to monitor
Real Scenario
"A crew working 10-hour days for two weeks makes a procedural error that results in a successful robbery. Investigation reveals they had been working excessive hours without adequate rest periods."
Training & Development
CIT operatives need ongoing training in threat response, robbery protocols, and procedural compliance - this is not one-time training but continuous competency maintenance
The Problems
Why This Matters for Cash in Transit
- SIA CVIT licence renewals require specific training, but tracking who needs renewal training and when is administratively complex
Operatives' licences expire because renewal training was not scheduled in time, leaving crews unavailable and routes uncovered
- Threat response and robbery protocols are trained once and then assumed, without regular refresher or scenario practice
When incidents occur, crews do not respond according to trained procedures because the training was too long ago
The Solution
How Training & Development Helps
SIA CVIT licence expiry tracking with renewal training scheduling, regular threat response scenario training, and competency verification
Licence renewals are managed proactively, crews receive regular refresher training on critical procedures, and competency is verified and documented
Use Cases:
- • SIA CVIT licence renewal management
- • Threat response and robbery protocol training
- • First aid and trauma certification
- • Driving qualification maintenance
- • Customer service and procedures training
- • New route induction and familiarisation
- • Annual security awareness refresher
Feature Screenshot
Training & Development
Real-World Examples
Example 1: SIA CVIT licence renewals require specific training, but tracking who needs renewal training and when is administratively complex
Real Scenario
"Three crew members have CVIT licences expiring in the same month. Training slots were not booked in advance. Renewal training is fully booked for six weeks. All three operatives must stop working until licensed, leaving you short-staffed."
Example 2: Threat response and robbery protocols are trained once and then assumed, without regular refresher or scenario practice
Real Scenario
"A crew is confronted by armed robbers. Instead of following the trained response protocol, they panic and deviate from procedure, increasing the danger to themselves. Post-incident review reveals they last received threat response training two years ago."
HR Management
CIT personnel vetting must go beyond standard security industry requirements given access to high-value cargo and the known risks of insider involvement in CIT attacks
The Problems
Why This Matters for Cash in Transit
- CIT operatives require extensive vetting given access to high-value cargo, but ongoing monitoring of personnel is limited after initial hire
Changes in operative circumstances that could indicate vulnerability to compromise are not identified
- When operatives leave, recovery of security equipment, uniforms, and ID badges is inconsistent
Former employees retain items that could be used to facilitate attacks or impersonation
The Solution
How HR Management Helps
Enhanced vetting with financial checks, ongoing personnel monitoring protocols, equipment tracking with termination recovery workflows, and secure credential management
Operatives are vetted to CIT industry standards with ongoing monitoring, all equipment is tracked and recovered at termination, and credentials are managed securely
Use Cases:
- • Enhanced financial vetting procedures
- • Ongoing personnel risk monitoring
- • Uniform and equipment tracking
- • ID badge and access credential management
- • Termination equipment recovery workflows
- • DBS and security clearance renewals
- • Reference verification procedures
Feature Screenshot
HR Management
Real-World Examples
Example 1: CIT operatives require extensive vetting given access to high-value cargo, but ongoing monitoring of personnel is limited after initial hire
Real Scenario
"An operative with significant gambling debts provides inside information for a planned robbery. Your vetting process checked financial status at hire but there was no ongoing monitoring to identify the developing vulnerability."
Example 2: When operatives leave, recovery of security equipment, uniforms, and ID badges is inconsistent
Real Scenario
"Months after termination, a former operative is found to still have a company ID badge. They claim they 'forgot to return it'. The risk of that badge being used for social engineering attacks on customers is significant."
Risk Assessment
CIT risk assessment must be dynamic - customer locations change, crime patterns shift, and intelligence evolves - static assessments quickly become inadequate
The Problems
Why This Matters for Cash in Transit
- Customer location risk assessments are completed at contract start but not updated when circumstances change - new construction, lighting changes, or local crime pattern shifts
Crews visit locations with changed risk profiles using outdated procedures and assessments
- Route risk assessments do not incorporate current intelligence about crime patterns, traffic conditions, or specific threats
Routes pass through high-risk areas without appropriate precautions or alternative planning
The Solution
How Risk Assessment Helps
Dynamic customer location risk assessments, route risk analysis with intelligence integration, and regular risk review scheduling
Location assessments stay current with changing conditions, route risks incorporate latest intelligence, and risk reviews occur on appropriate schedules
Use Cases:
- • Customer location security assessments
- • Route risk analysis and alternatives
- • ATM site risk profiling
- • Intelligence-led risk updates
- • New customer risk evaluation
- • High-value movement risk assessment
- • Post-incident risk review and lessons
Feature Screenshot
Risk Assessment
Real-World Examples
Example 1: Customer location risk assessments are completed at contract start but not updated when circumstances change - new construction, lighting changes, or local crime pattern shifts
Real Scenario
"A customer location that was low-risk has become high-risk due to new construction providing concealment opportunities. Your assessment from three years ago does not reflect current conditions. A crew is attacked in circumstances your outdated assessment did not anticipate."
Example 2: Route risk assessments do not incorporate current intelligence about crime patterns, traffic conditions, or specific threats
Real Scenario
"Police intelligence indicates increased CIT targeting in a specific area. Your route assessment predates this intelligence and continues to route vehicles through the target zone without additional precautions."
Incident Reporting
CIT incident reporting must support both commercial discrepancy investigations and security threat analysis - both require systematic documentation and analysis
The Problems
Why This Matters for Cash in Transit
- Discrepancy investigations require detailed documentation of collection and delivery procedures, but records are often incomplete or inconsistent
Discrepancy liability cannot be determined, leading to disputed costs and damaged customer relationships
- Security incidents and near-misses are not systematically reported and analysed, so patterns are not identified
Attack methodologies are not identified across incidents, preventing proactive countermeasures
The Solution
How Incident Reporting Helps
Structured discrepancy investigation documentation, security incident reporting with pattern analysis, and suspicious activity logging
Every discrepancy is documented for investigation, security incidents are analysed for patterns, and suspicious activity is captured and correlated
Use Cases:
- • Discrepancy investigation documentation
- • Security incident reporting
- • Suspicious activity and surveillance logging
- • Attack attempt documentation
- • Near-miss and concern reporting
- • Vehicle and equipment damage records
- • Customer complaint investigation
Feature Screenshot
Incident Reporting
Real-World Examples
Example 1: Discrepancy investigations require detailed documentation of collection and delivery procedures, but records are often incomplete or inconsistent
Real Scenario
"A customer reports a shortage in their delivery. Your crew maintains the correct amount was delivered. Without detailed documentation of the handover procedure, verification, and sign-off, you cannot prove your case. You absorb the loss."
Example 2: Security incidents and near-misses are not systematically reported and analysed, so patterns are not identified
Real Scenario
"Three different crews report being followed on different days but each incident is treated in isolation. When an attack occurs, review reveals the surveillance pattern was detectable if reports had been correlated."
COSHH Management
CIT vehicles contain chemical anti-attack devices that crews must understand, plus routine exposure to cleaning and maintenance chemicals requiring COSHH management
The Problems
Why This Matters for Cash in Transit
- CIT vehicles use dye pack and other anti-attack devices containing chemicals that crews are exposed to during activation testing or post-incident
Crews are exposed to dye or chemical irritants without understanding the hazards or proper handling procedures
- Vehicle cleaning products and maintenance materials are used without COSHH awareness
Crews are exposed to cleaning chemical hazards without proper precautions
The Solution
How COSHH Management Helps
COSHH assessments for anti-attack device chemicals, vehicle cleaning and maintenance products, and post-incident decontamination procedures
Crews understand hazards from security devices and cleaning products, appropriate PPE is available and used, and post-incident procedures are documented
Use Cases:
- • Dye pack and chemical device safety
- • Post-activation decontamination procedures
- • Vehicle cleaning product assessments
- • Cash handling surface sanitisation
- • Vehicle maintenance chemical safety
- • First aid for chemical exposure
- • PPE requirements for security devices
Feature Screenshot
COSHH Management
Real-World Examples
Example 1: CIT vehicles use dye pack and other anti-attack devices containing chemicals that crews are exposed to during activation testing or post-incident
Real Scenario
"A dye pack accidentally activates in a vehicle. The crew attempts to clean up without PPE and suffers skin irritation from the dye chemicals. They did not realise the dye contained irritant compounds."
Example 2: Vehicle cleaning products and maintenance materials are used without COSHH awareness
Real Scenario
"A crew uses a vehicle interior cleaning product daily to clean cash handling surfaces. The product requires gloves for repeated exposure, but no COSHH information was provided and no PPE is available."
Results Cash in Transit Businesses Achieve
Other Security Solutions
Secure Your Compliance Standards
Join CIT companies using Assistant Manager to maintain the highest security and operational standards.